One Friday Gary Oates and John Greenler appeared on The Larry Meiller show to talk biofuels and take questions from the audience. A link to listen is below:
One Friday Gary Oates and John Greenler appeared on The Larry Meiller show to talk biofuels and take questions from the audience. A link to listen is below:
A six-year Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC) study on the viability of different bioenergy feedstocks recently demonstrated that perennial cropping systems such as switchgrass, giant miscanthus, poplar, native grasses, and prairie can yield as much biomass as corn stover.
The study is significant for beginning to address one of the biofuel industry’s biggest questions: can environmentally beneficial crops produce enough biomass to make their conversion to ethanol efficient and economical?
(Continues at: https://www.glbrc.org/news/six-year-study-suggests-perennial-crop-yields-can-compete-corn-stover)
Scientists at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and Michigan State University (MSU) report today that emissions of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) can be reduced significantly by replacing annual biofuels feedstocks, such as corn, with second-generation, perennial feedstocks such as switchgrass.
“If we are going to add second-generation biofuel crops to the landscape, we need a better sense of how they’ll impact ecosystem processes such as greenhouse gas emissions,” says Gary Oates, research scientist in the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC) Sustainability group and the paper’s lead author.
The study, published in the journal Global Change Biology–Bioenergy, compares eight different biofuel cropping systems planted at both UW–Madison’s Arlington Agricultural Research Station and MSU’s Kellogg Biological Research Station.
So-called “first-generation” biofuel crops in the study include corn, soybean, and canola, which need to be replanted each year. Second-generation crops include switchgrass, miscanthus, poplar, a mixture of native grasses, and a prairie mix. These perennial crops require an “establishment phase” after planting, a few years during which they settle into a “production phase.”
“We understand annual systems like corn really well but, up till now, little research has been done on perennial N2O emissions during that establishment phase, when farmland has just been converted to a perennial system,” says Oates.
Emissions data collected during the first three years of the long-term experiment indicate that cumulative N2O emissions from fertilized second-generation cropping systems were 57% lower than emissions from first-generation systems. In addition, cumulative N2O emissions from unfertilized second-generation cropping systems were 85% lower compared to first-generation systems.
If second-generation biofuel crops can meet productivity needs with fewer fertilizer inputs, the study suggests, they have the potential to dramatically reduce N2O emissions compared to the first–generation crops used for almost all of today’s biofuel production.
But the researchers also conclude that the relationship between N2O flux and environmental conditions is not generalizable across numerous and varied cropping systems, indicating that the computer models currently used to predict N2O emissions, especially for perennials, need improvement.
“We’ve definitely gained a better understanding of biofuel cropping systems, but the underlying mechanisms driving N2O production remain elusive,” says Randy Jackson, co-leader of GLBRC’s Sustainability research group. “The amounts of water, nitrogen, and carbon in the soil are clearly important but we have more work to do.”
The first phase of the analysis used data collected between 2009 and 2011. Researchers are now in the process of analyzing an additional three years of data collected during the production phase of the perennial systems. A primary focus of the current work is gaining a better understanding of the genetic make-up of the soil’s microbial community and how knowledge of that genetic make-up might be used to predict N2O emissions for biofuel cropping systems.
David Duncan loves to think about dirt, and a quick glance at his family tree could lead one to believe he comes by it naturally. His grandfather was an agricultural extension agent and his handful of uncles includes two agronomists and an expert on fungi.
But Duncan, a University of Wisconsin–Madison doctoral student in agronomy and a Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center researcher, asserts that what really pulled him into agronomy was his mother.
“My interest in biology was agricultural from the get-go and I think it’s because my mom always loved the idea of having a great big garden,” Duncan says. “Early on, I learned from her that growing things was a good pursuit, something worth doing.”
Duncan spent his childhood in central Wyoming, an arid region where it’s hard to grow much of anything. He recalls tending some strawberries and rhubarb with his mom, but remembers even better the summers he spent digging around in the decomposing pile of grass clippings out by the shed.
“It was sort of an early experiment in microbial ecology,” Duncan says. “Unfortunately, it ended when the hornets set up a nest there.”
Boy scouts and soccer eventually displaced the compost pile, but Duncan ventured back to biology as an undergraduate at Stanford University where he studied plant biology and biotechnology and became interested in understanding the ecology of sustainable cropping systems.
Duncan graduated from Stanford in 2006 and joined UW–Madison’s College of Agricultural and Life Sciences master’s program in agroecology in 2007.
In 2010, he became a doctoral student in agronomy where his study of cropping systems brought him right back to the microbial ecology he enjoyed as a boy.
Today, when Duncan looks at dirt, he sees habitat for the millions of different species of microbes residing there.
“Microbes are incredibly charismatic if you have the right mindset,” says Duncan. “They’re quirky. They do things that don’t make sense at the human scale. For example, there are microbes that split up metabolic processes among multiple different organisms … kind of like you eating something and then your partner being the one to actually digest it.”
Microbes, the oldest life form on earth, are single-cell organisms so tiny that billions can live in a thimbleful of soil. But Duncan, whose research focuses on sustainable biofuel feedstocks, is searching agricultural fields for something even smaller – a single microbial gene called nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) that’s responsible for making the loss of agricultural nitrogen less harmful to the environment.
When farmers apply nitrogen fertilizer to crops, the fertilizer is eventually transformed into nitrate. Nitrate is a simple form of nitrogen that’s easy for plants to use, but can also be lost in run-off or end up in the soil. Nitrogen loss is bad for farmers because they have to pay for the fertilizer, but even worse is what what nitrogen turns into when you lose it: nitrates in your drinking water and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere.
Nitrous oxide is a significant ozone-depleting chemical and a highly potent greenhouse gas, and agricultural use of fertilizers plays a significant role in its production. In fact, nitrogen loss from agricultural soil accounts for about 75% of total U.S. nitrous oxide emissions.
Duncan is comparing cropping systems including corn, switchgrass, and native prairie grass in an effort to understand how the microbial community as well as system variables such as crop type, temperature, moisture, and nitrogen availability contribute to nitrous oxide emissions. And the nosZ gene is a central focus of his research.
Some microbes have a group of genes that allows them to “breathe” nitrate. When microbes with an active nosZ gene breathe nitrate, it’s chemically converted to the harmless nitrogen gas that comprises 70% of our atmosphere. For microbes lacking an active nosZ gene, however, the nitrate conversion process produces nitrous oxide.
“If the nosZ gene does it job,” Duncan says, “we don’t see nitrous oxide emissions. But if nosZ is absent, or not working, then we see a lot of nitrous oxide emissions.”
Duncan would like to use the prevalence of nosZ to predict whether the nitrogen conversion process in a particular soil will be environmentally harmful. But it’s not that simple – sometimes, active microbes with the nosZ conversion ability don’t convert nitrogen at all.
For the nosZ conversion of nitrogen to take place, a number of conditions have to be met: (1) The microbe has to have the nosZ gene (many don’t); (2) The microbe has to be “awake” (many are inactive in a state resembling hibernation); and (3) The nosZ gene has to be “turned on” (in scientific terms, “expressed”).
Duncan’s work looks closely at both the microbial community and the environmental variables in order to understand the conditions that best foster the presence and wakefulness of nosZ microbes as well as the “turning on” of the nosZ gene.
“It’s important to have both research components in place,” Duncan explains, “because variables such as temperature, moisture, and nitrogen availability determine whether the microbes with the preferred conversion ability are awake and ready to render excess nitrogen harmless.”
While many of Duncan’s research hours are spent in the field — sampling soils and documenting nitrous oxide emissions — far more of his time is spent analyzing vast digital datasets of microbial genetic data, looking at the abundance and types of nosZ present in agricultural soils.
Making sense of the data generated by sequencing microbial DNA is complicated, in part because most sequencing technologies have been developed to analyze human DNA. Any two people will have DNA sequences that are about 99.9% identical. In sharp contrast, just one gram of soil can contain somewhere between one and ten million different species of microbes, and some of these species are nothing alike.
Duncan, however, appears completely undaunted by the complexity.
“I’m happiest when I’m doing data analysis,” Duncan explains. “There’s something extremely rewarding about uncovering patterns in your data, particularly when they’re patterns you can fit into a biologically coherent narrative.”
Duncan’s careful analysis of local soil is helping create a coherent narrative for biofuel cropping systems. His work is a starting point for understanding the complex relationships among energy crops, microbial communities, environmental variables, and nitrogen loss.
“Currently, we plant crops and measure nitrous oxide emissions, which is laborious,” Duncan says. “But we’re working to get to the point where we could instead use soil analysis, including nosZ content, to predict potential emissions.”
Short-term, Duncan believes his research can help both farmers and scientists evaluate potential bioenergy crops. Long-term, Duncan hopes his work will help scientists predict the environmental effects of different biofuel cropping systems in changing climates across the world.
This story was originally published on the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center website.
By now most of us are accustomed to filling our cars with fuels that are part ethanol, and we know that corn is not only in our tortillas but also in our gas tanks. Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (GLBRC) researchers, however, are moving beyond corn and other first-generation biofuel feedstocks in an attempt to fill our tanks with environmentally sustainable biofuels.
Randy Jackson, GLBRC’s sustainability research group co-leader, says “the focus of agricultural biofuel research has changed recently from ‘agronomic intensification’ to ‘ecological intensification.’ In other words, it’s not just about how much money you can make growing a crop anymore…it’s about how we can grow what we need and nurture the land at the same time.”
“One way to move towards a system of ecological intensification,” Jackson continues, “is to move from fields of corn, which need to be planted annually and require lots of fertilizer, to mixed varieties of perennial grasses such as switchgrass.”
Perennial grasses dramatically reduce soil erosion, provide protective cover and food for wildlife, encourage bird populations and insect pollination, foster methane-consuming microbes, and suppress the invasion of agricultural pests. Perennial grasses also use nitrogen more efficiently than annual monocultures such as corn, which could mean less nitrogen fertilizer in our fields.
Reducing the use of nitrogen fertilizer, in addition to saving farmers time and money, is a big plus for the environment. Most crops are unable to retain the majority of applied nitrogen. Some is lost in run-off where it contributes to nitrate contamination of ground water, streams, and rivers. At the same time, a significant amount of excess nitrogen ends up in the soil, where microbes convert it to the greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O).
N2O is a highly potent greenhouse gas — the atmospheric-warming impact of a single pound of N2O is more than 300 times that of a pound of carbon dioxide. In addition, N2O is the most significant ozone-depleting chemical resulting from human activity. And currently, N2O accounts for about 6% of GHG emissions resulting from human activities, with 75% of those emissions coming from the agricultural use of synthetic fertilizers.
Although the ideal field of biofuel feedstock, from an ecological standpoint, would contain a variety of perennial grasses, studying switchgrass, a native prairie grass, is an important step toward realizing that ideal.
“Switchgrass is a promising biofuel feedstock and represents a kind of halfway point between agronomic intensification and ecological intensification,” says GLBRC doctoral researcher David Duncan, “It has the downside of being a single species, but it’s perennial so you don’t have to replant it every year. And it doesn’t require as many inputs, such as nitrogen, as a crop like corn.”
Switchgrass also has the advantages of being fast-growing, productive, and able to grow on marginal land unsuited for food crops.
But it’s a major transition for farmers accustomed to tending monoculture crops such as corn to add perennial cropping systems to their crop selections. In a corn field, every plant is genetically identical and the varieties have become so predictable that farmers know, almost to the day, how long they will take to mature.
In a switchgrass field, on the other hand, you find many genetic differences within a single variety, and the time required for crop maturation varies significantly depending on weather, light conditions, moisture, and nutrient availability.
Moving biofuel cropping systems toward long-term sustainability and profitability will thus require a better understanding of how perennial grasses develop under differing conditions. GLBRC doctoral researcher Laura Smith, for example, is trying to determine the relationship between biomass productivity and nitrogen uptake in switchgrass fields.
“We are trying to understand the ways that perennial grasses such as switchgrass use nitrogen so we can reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizer and still maximize biomass harvest,” Smith explains. “A significant challenge to the use of these grasses as biofuel feedstocks is the inefficiency of harvest — currently, if we wait until fall to harvest, we are only able to collect about 60% of harvestable biomass from switchgrass plants and we need to figure out how to improve on that.”
One important factor limiting maximum biomass harvest is harvest timing. Plants typically reach peak biomass in August. Yet the long-term health of perennial plant systems depends on their having the chance to senesce, or let the plant system’s nutrients return to the roots, before harvest.
“The time of peak biomass yield is also the time when plants have the highest nutrient content.” Smith says. “If that’s when you harvest, you’re pulling huge amounts of nutrients off the field. You are losing a whole lot of nitrogen and that means you’ll have to use more fertilizer for next year’s crop.”
But waiting for senescence significantly compromises biomass yield, as plants recycle carbohydrates and leaf litter falls to the ground.
“Finding the balance point where we can maximize yield and still ensure nutrient resorption moves us toward ecological intensification,” Smith says. “Some of our work indicates that fertilized switchgrass plants take longer to resorb nitrogen than unfertilized plants. If we can reduce added fertilizer and get the same amount of biomass off a field, it’s good for the farmer and very good for the environment.”
In focusing on ecological intensification, GLBRC researchers are tackling a central challenge of “second generation” biofuel feedstocks: promoting highly productive harvests that also nurture the environment. – Leslie Shown
Originally seen on the GLBRC website, here: https://www.glbrc.org/news/moving-toward-ecological-intensification-one-prairie-grass-time
UW Associate Agronomy Professor Natalia De-Leon is profiled in an article by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center discussing her research in mapping the genetic characteristics of corn.
Natalia and her team spend long hours every growing season manually pollinating and mapping acres of corn in order to track genetic characteristics among different strains.
“When you drive along the highway, you see corn and it all looks the same, but actually corn has a lot of genetic variability,” de Leon explains. “You’ve got different plant heights, kernel colors, cob colors, different compositions, different qualities of grain, and different sizes of cob, and the list goes on.”
The GLBRC performs research on converting biomass to ethanol and other biofuels. For more information, visit https://www.glbrc.org/.